Cloud & DevOps

Where to host your SaaS: AWS vs Vercel vs Render

Vercel for the Next.js front end, AWS for control and scale, Render for a simple middle ground. Many SaaS use a mix — here's how to decide.

Bilal KhursheedFebruary 26, 20267 min read

Host your Next.js front end on Vercel for the best developer experience, run your backend and database on AWS for control and scale, or use Render as a simple all-in-one middle ground. A very common, pragmatic setup is Next.js on Vercel plus data and services on AWS.

The options

  • Vercel: best-in-class Next.js hosting, edge network, zero-config deploys — ideal for the front end.
  • AWS: maximum control, scale, and compliance options — more setup and ops expertise required.
  • Render: a simple platform-as-a-service for apps, databases, and jobs — a good middle ground for small teams.

Which to choose

  • Early-stage, want to move fast: Vercel for frontend, a managed database, minimal ops.
  • Need scale, compliance, or complex infrastructure: AWS.
  • Want simplicity without going full AWS: Render.

Our approach

We often host the Next.js front end on Vercel and put data, backend services, and anything compliance-sensitive on AWS, using Docker for portability and infrastructure-as-code with CI/CD so deploys are repeatable. The goal is the simplest setup that meets your scale and compliance needs — no more.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

A common pragmatic setup is Next.js on Vercel for the front end plus backend and data on AWS for control and scale. Render is a simpler all-in-one middle ground for smaller teams. Choose by your stage, scale, and compliance needs.

They're often used together: Vercel for the Next.js front end (great DX and edge delivery) and AWS for backend, database, and compliance-sensitive workloads. Vercel alone suits early stages; AWS is for scale and control.

Ready when you are

Let's build your product.

Book a free, no-obligation discovery call. We'll map the outcome and the fastest path to shipping it.